Acetaminophen is sometimes given to infants and small
children following shots to prevent fever, a common reaction to vaccinations.
This study examined the effects of acetaminophen on immune response after
initial and booster vaccinations.
Two hundred twenty-six children from 10 different medical
centers were randomly selected to receive three doses every six to eight hours
for 24 hours after immunizations. Just 42 percent of these children experienced
fevers (100.4 degrees F or above), compared to 66 percent of a control group of
233.
When it was time for booster shots, parents were asked to
repeat the process. There was a lower incidence of fever in both groups—36
percent for those who took acetaminophen and 58 percent for those who did not.
Children who received acetaminophen , however, had fewer
antibodies, indicating more susceptibility to disease. In the studied children,
pneumonia, hepatitis B, whooping cough, polio, diphtheria and tetanus
antibodies were fewer following vaccinations and boosters with acetaminophen
use.
Antibodies are proteins in the immune system
(immunoglobulins) that bind to harmful pathogens (viruses) to keep them away
from healthy white blood cells. Without these antibodies, the body’s immune
system is more susceptible to disease.
When vaccines fail to protect against diseases, the health
of the entire community is at stake because viruses are more easily spread.
“This point has implications, especially for Haemophilus
influenzae, for which higher and sustained antibody concentrations are needed
(to reduce transmission),” says Dr. Robert T Chen of the Centers for Disease
Control in Atlanta, “…and for pertussis, the bacterial vaccine-preventable
disease that is least controlled.”
Although they’re not entirely sure why children taking
acetaminophen had fewer antibodies, doctors plan to explore the issue further.
They stress the importance of this information, and advise against unnecessary
acetaminophen use.
“(A)dministration of antipyretic drugs at the time of
vaccination should nevertheless no longer be routinely recommended without
careful weighing of the expected benefits and risks,” wrote lead author Dr.
Roman Pryula of the University of Defense in Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
The study appears in this month’s online issue of The
Lancet.
The largest study ever conducted on
The ambitious study was originally ordered by Congress in 2000, but budget issues and logistical planning delayed the NIH from beginning the study until now. Researchers want to investigate how environmental factors encountered in early life can “tip the scales” for genetically vulnerable individuals leading to disorders such as autism, asthma, and cerebral palsy, and perhaps even to diseases of adulthood like Parkinson’s disease and schizophrenia. Because of the large number of individuals enrolled, the study also has the capability to assess uncommon disorders, as well as how exposures to different environmental conditions and genetic factors may interact.
Enrollment in the study begins this week at two very different sites:
the urban, industrial
The first locations will serve as pilot sites for the study's initial setup, with nationwide enrollment set for summer 2010. Eventually, the study will expand to include a total of 105 locations throughout the country to ensure that the data collected reflect a scientifically representative sample of the nation's diverse population.
Scientists are seeking women who are trying to get pregnant or who are already in the in the early stages of pregnancy. Study participants will be required to provide a series of samples, both biological – including urine, blood, hair, and genital swabs – and environmental – including samples of dust, water, and air from inside their homes. Pregnant moms will participate in monthly phone calls and be required to keep records of medical events, diet, and activity. After birth, their babies' health will be tracked through periodic exams and checks of their home environment in the first year of life and beyond.
However, if you live in one of the enrollment areas, the NIH urges you NOT to contact them in an attempt to become a study participant. In order to maintain scientific validity, participants must come from within narrowly defined geographic locations. Researchers are calling homes as well as enlisting the help of local prenatal care providers to recruit participants.
A listing of the exact locations of the first seven sites to enroll is available on the National Children’s Study Web site at http://www.nationalchildrensstudy.gov/about/overview/Pages/Study-Centers-Awarded-12-18-08.pdf.
For more information about health issues for children, join the Healia Health Community for child health. For more information about childhood asthma, check out the Healia Health Guide on Asthma.
Below is a list of the top 15 healthiest countries in the world as ranked by Forbes magazine. To arrive at their rank, research staff at Forbes examined statistics such as pollution; the percentage of a country's population with access to improved drinking water and sanitation; infant mortality rates; the rate of prevalence of tuberculosis; the density of physicians per 1,000 people; undernourishment rates; and healthy life expectancy for men. Forbes eliminated from the analysis the countries that did not have statistics in every measure (including some that would likely have made the top 15 such as Ireland, Belgium, and Norway.
The 15 healthiest countries in the world are:
Source: Forbes Special Report: World's Healthiest Countries, Allison Van Dusen and Ana Patricia Ferrey, April 08, 2008.
Photo: keeshu, MorgueFIle license
The following is a list of the healthiest cities in America as ranked by Sperling's BestPlaces and Centrum. The Centrum Healthiest Cities Study is a comprehensive "health report card" of U.S. cities based on the key factors that can contribute to overall well-being.
To compile the list, Sperling’s and Centrum culled data on 50 U.S. cities from both public and private sources and assessed each city against 50 select measures in five major categories: Physical Activity, Health Status, Nutrition, Lifestyle Pursuits, and Mental Wellness.
The top 10 healthiest U.S. cities are:
For more information on living healthy, join the Healia Health Community for Excercise and Fitness or the Healia Health Community on Diet and Nutrition.
Source: Sperling’s Best Places. More information about the methods and resources used can be found here: http://www.bestplaces.net/docs/studies/healthy_methodology.aspx
A report released by the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) this week finds that car and other
transportation-related accidents are the leading cause of death for children
and teens in the U.S. About 8,000 child and teen deaths each year in the U.S. involve a motor vehicle
occupant, pedestrian, or cyclist, with the highest fatality rates being among
occupants of motor vehicles.
To prepare the report, the CDC examined data collected between 2000 and 2006 on emergency room visits and fatalities in children and teens from birth to age nineteen. According to the report, an estimated 9.2 million children visit emergency departments each year for unintentional injuries. Falls caused the most non-fatal injuries (about 2.8 million each year) and were associated with over half of the nonfatal injuries involving children less than one year. Drowning and poisoning were also leading causes of non-fatal injuries among children less than four years old
The report also notes that between 2000 and 2005, unintentional injuries resulted in 73,052 deaths among children and teens, with transportation-related deaths leading the way. Such deaths were highest among children 15 to 19 years of age. Overall, males were almost twice as likely to die from unintentional injuries as females.
The release of the CDC’s report coincided with the World Health Organization′s (WHO) and the United Nations Children′s Fund′s (UNICEF) launch of the 2008 World Report on Child Injury Prevention. The global report found that car crashes, drowning, and other accidents kill 830,000 children worldwide each year. Road crashes are the leading cause of accidental death worldwide, killing 260,000 children each year and injuring 10 million, with drowning, burns, falls, and accidental poisoning rounding out the top five.
Around 95 percent of the worldwide accidental deaths occurred in the developing world, mostly in Africa, and in richer nations deaths from accidents disproportionately affect the poor.
For information about the preventing child injuries and death, see the CDC’s “Protect the Ones You Love” initiative at www.cdc.gov/safechild. The Healia Health Community on Child Health is a great place to discuss the measures you take to keep your kids safe and get ideas from other parents.
Sources: UPI, CDC
Photo: Old Man Lee, Flickr, Creative Commons
A recent study reports that babies who are born in autumn
are more likely to develop asthma than babies born at any other time of year.
According to the study, newborns with birthdates four months before the peak of
cold and flu season have a 30% greater risk of developing childhood asthma than
other babies.
Researchers at Vanderbilt University examined the records of 95,000 infants and their mothers in Tennessee. They found that all babies who had a clinically significant lung infection called bronchiolitis at any time during infancy were at increased risk of asthma, but autumn babies had the greatest risk.
While it was already known that babies born during the fall in the Northern Hemisphere have a greater risk of developing asthma, this study is the first to connect that increase with the timing of peak viral activity in the winter months.
The increase in asthma risk may be related to a common respiratory virus called the respiratory syncytial virus or RSV that is responsible for many of the cases of cold-like symptoms experienced by adults and children each winter. Most children are infected with RSV early in life, with infections occurring most often between the ages of 3 and 6 months. The virus usually clears up without serious complications. However, in some cases it can lead to bronchiolitis which, as this study demonstrates, is associated with greater asthma risk.
The researchers propose that while genetic risk factors probably predispose some children to developing asthma, RSV infection during the winter may be the environmental trigger that activates those asthma risk genes. If so, this suggests that preventing RSV infection in newborns could prevent them from developing asthma.
So should you call your child’s pediatrician and ask for an RSV vaccine shot? Unfortunately, no such vaccine yet exits, but several pharmaceutical companies have RSV vaccines in development. There is a drug called Synagis (palivizumab) that provides passive immunity against RSV but it must be administered monthly at a cost of around $2000 per dose and it is usually reserved for babies at high risk of RSV complications (such as those born premature).
For now, parents of newborns born in autumn should take precautions to try to prevent spreading RSV infection to their baby. A simple way to help prevent RSV infection is to wash your hands often, especially before touching your baby. Other tips for RSV prevention include insisting that others wash their hands before touching your baby, keeping people with colds or fevers away from your baby, avoiding contact with other young children, and making sure your baby is not exposed to tobacco smoke.
For more information on asthma, see the Healia Health Guide on Asthma or ask the online community at the Healia Health Community for Asthma. If you have asthma and your symptoms worsen during the wintertime, you may be able to better control your asthma symptoms. See the Healia Health Guide on Uncontrolled Asthma for more details.
Photo: Havenga, Stock.xchng, Creative Commons
How dangerous is the chemical known as bisphenol
A (BPA)? According to an independent panel of scientific advisers, it’s much
more dangerous than a recent Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) report suggested.
BPA is a chemical used to harden plastics and is found in several products including baby bottles, plastic food packaging, and the lining of food cans.
The panel charges that the FDA ignored scientific evidence and used flawed methods when it issued its draft risk assessment of BPA in August stating that an “adequate margin of safety” existed for BPA exposure. The FDA stated that the small amounts of BPA that migrate from food containers into the food they hold are not dangerous to infants or adults.
The panel, set up specifically to review the FDA's risk assessment of BPA, said that the FDA had relied on industry-funded studies and ignored a mountain of data including more than 100 scientific studies that have linked BPA to health problems in laboratory animals including breast and prostate cancers, diabetes, hyperactivity and reproductive problems. The panel also questioned the methods used in the FDA studies to determine the levels of BPA in infant formula, concluding that the FDA report "creates a false sense of security” and recommending that the agency redo its risk assessment.
Environmental groups want to ban BPA in infant products because the chemical can mimic the effects of the hormone estrogen and interfere with their development. Infants may be at increased risk of exposure because their kidneys do not eliminate the chemical from the body as fast as adults. Babies can be exposed to BPA through bottles and through baby formula packaged in containers made with the chemical, including cans.
If you want to lessen your family’s exposure to BPA, you can avoid eating foods from plastic containers labeled with the number 7 (usually found on the bottom of the container, inside the recycle symbol), which often contain BPA. You can also limit your use of canned foods and infant formula, most of which come in cans lined with BPA.
Have more questions about BPA and other food contaminants? The members and health experts of Healia Health Communities are waiting to help you.
Photo: iMorpheus, Flickr, Creative Commons
Researchers from Johns Hopkins University have published an article warning consumers to limit consumption of energy drinks that contain high levels of caffeine. The researchers reported that some energy drinks can contain many times the amount of caffeine as a regular cola drink. As a result, they recommend energy drinks carry a warning label that shows their caffeine content and includes information about possible health risks.
Because caffeinated energy drinks are marketed as supplements and not as regular soft drinks, they are not required to display their caffeine content and are not subject to the Food and Drug Administration's regulations regarding caffeine content in beverages.
Excessive caffeine consumption may result in fast heart rates (tachycardia), nausea and vomiting, difficulty sleeping, increased urination, anxiety, tremors, and depression.
Given that many high energy drinks are being marketed to children and young people, it’s important to be aware of how much caffeine your children are consuming. In addition, because caffeine acts as an appetite suppressant, children may not be getting proper nutrition.
Join Healia’s Diet and Nutrition Community to learn more about this and other nutrition issues.
About | Privacy Policy | Business Solutions | Advertise | Contact | Add Healia to your site
©2009. Healia / Meredith Corporation
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. All content on this Web site, including medical opinion and any other health-related information, is for informational purposes only and should not be used for a specific diagnosis or individual treatment plan for any situation. Use of this site and the information contained herein does not create a doctor-patient relationship. Always seek the direct advice of your doctor in connection with any questions or issues you may have regarding your own health or the health of others.