For people with springtime allergies, this time of year can be difficult to deal with. Fortunately, there are ways to help minimize your exposure to potential outdoor allergens and thereby reduce their aggravating effects. Yesterday, we provided a list of the top 5 "dos" for preventing outdoor allergy symptoms. Today we present a list of the top 5 don’ts for minimizing symptoms caused by springtime allergies.
To find out more about outdoor allergy treatments and prevention, see "What Treatments are Available for Outdoor Allergies?" and "How Can I Prevent Outdoor Allergies" in the Healia Health Guide to Outdoor Allergies.
Source: American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology, Tips to Remember: Outdoor allergens. http://www.aaaai.org/patients/publicedmat/tips/outdoorallergens.stm
Photo: tanakawho, Flickr, Creative Commons
It’s that time of year again. In many parts of the country, the snow has melted, the grass has resumed its growth cycle, flowers have started to appear… and springtime allergy season has begun.
For people with springtime allergies, this time of year can be difficult to deal with. Fortunately, there are things you can do to help minimize your exposure to potential outdoor allergens and reduce their aggravating effects. The following tips include the top 5 things you can do to help avoid symptoms caused by outdoor allergens. Tomorrow’s list will give the top 5 "don’ts."
To find out more about outdoor allergy treatments and prevention, see "What Treatments are Available for Outdoor Allergies?" and ""How Can I Prevent Outdoor Allergies" in the Healia Health Guide to Outdoor Allergies .
Source: American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology, Tips to Remember: Outdoor allergens. http://www.aaaai.org/patients/publicedmat/tips/outdoorallergens.stm
Photo: spakattacks, Flickr, Creative Commons
The report Shortchanging America's Health: A State-By-State Look at How Federal Public Health Dollars are Spent was released this week by the non-profit organizations Trust for America's Health (TFAH) and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF). It outlines federal government funding for disease prevention programs provided to the fifty states in fiscal year 2008.
The report found that annual per capita spending varies widely among the states (ranging from $12.74 and $52.78 per person). The national average for state funding from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for public health is $17.60 per person. The report notes that even at the high end, this level of spending on public health is a tiny fraction of the country's total investment in health. The vast majority of heath spending is invested in treating people after they've become sick. The report authors suggest that spending more money on disease prevention programs up front would lessen the need to spend so much on disease treatment "after the fact."
Below is a list of the bottom 10 states that received the least funding per state resident from the CDC in fiscal year 2008, followed in parentheses by the dollar amount of per capita spending.
The top 10 worst states for federal public health funding per capita are:
Interested in learning more about disease prevention? Join the Healia Support Group for Wellness and Lifestyle.
Related blog post: The Top 10 States for Federal Public Health Funding
Source: Trust for America’s Health and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Shortchanging America's Health: A State-By-State Look at How Federal Public Health Dollars are Spent, 3/09. http://healthyamericans.org/assets/files/shortchanging09.pdf
Photo: ThrasherDave, Flickr, Creative Commons
Two non-profit organizations, the Trust for America's Health (TFAH) and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) today released a new report on federal government funding for the fifty states in fiscal year 2008 for publich health disease prevention programs. The report, Shortchanging America's Health: A State-By-State Look at How Federal Public Health Dollars are Spent also examines how the economic downturn could lead to serious cuts to disease prevention and emergency preparedness programs at the state level.
The report found that states receive an average of $17.60 per person from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for public health programs and that annual per capita spending varies widely among the states (ranging from $12.74 and $52.78 per person). The report notes that even at the high end, this level of spending on public health is a tiny fraction of the country's total investment in health. The vast majority of heath spending is invested in treating people after they've become sick. The report authors suggest that spending more money on disease prevention programs up front would lessen the need to spend so much on disease treatment "after the fact."
In tough financial times, the problem of small investment in public health is only expected to get worse, leading to serious long term consequences for the nation’s health and health spending. State funding for public health programs is expected to drop given the widespread budget shortfalls among the states and federal funding is unlikely to make up the all difference. However, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (also known as the stimulus package) includes an additional $1 billion for public health programs for next year, which will help provide additional support in many communities.
Below is a list of the top 10 states that received the most funding per state resident from the CDC in fiscal year 2008, followed in parentheses by the dollar amount of per capita spending. It is no coincidence that the list is populated mostly with America’s smallest states: some public health programs funded by the CDC are not apportioned by population, giving smaller states a larger amount per person.
The top 10 states for federal public health funding per capita are:
Interested in learning more about disease prevention? Join the Healia Health Community for Wellness and Lifestyle.
Source: Trust for America’s Health and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Shortchanging America's Health: A State-By-State Look at How Federal Public Health Dollars are Spent, 3/09. http://healthyamericans.org/assets/files/shortchanging09.pdf
Photo: jswieringa, Flickr, Creative Commons
This weekend is the start of Daylight Saving Time. Sunday, March 8 at 2am, most Americans will "spring" forward one hour (despite the fact that the recent lengthening of DST now means the "springing" actually takes place during the winter). In a previous blog post, we presented some of the health problems associated with the sudden time change and its attendant lack of sleep, and provided some tips for easing the transition into DST. We also mentioned that the adjustment can be made more easily if you regularly practice good sleep hygiene. In this article, we present some tips for good sleep hygiene that, if practiced regularly, can not only aid the transition to DST but also help you fall asleep more easily and get more restful sleep for the rest of the year.
In order to practice good sleep hygiene, researchers advise you to:
For more information about good sleep habits, read the Healia Health Guide to Excessive Sleepiness. If you have a question about methods for easing the transition to DST, Ask the Experts at Healia Health Communities.
Source: University of Michigan Center for Sleep Science, Principles of Sleep Hygiene. http://www.med.umich.edu/neuro/Sleeplab/patients/resources.htm#principles
Photo (adapted): ***j9***, Flickr, Creative Commons
This Sunday, March 8th marks the beginning of Daylight Saving Time (DST), when most Americans will move their clocks ahead one hour. This is the third year in which DST will start "early" on the second Sunday in March, thanks to a Congressional bill passed in 2005 that lengthens DST by nearly a month. While the energy saving from this program is still a topic of debate, there is ample evidence that "springing forward" may have negative health consequences.
Researchers from the University of Michigan say that while for some losing an hour of sleep causes only minor sleepiness and irritability in the period immediately following the clock change, for others the effects of the switch to DST may be more serious. The good news is that some simple preparations may help reduce these negative effects for everyone.
Studies show that in the weeks following the switch to DST, work performance may suffer and there is a greater risk of car accidents while driving, especially on the Monday following the switch. Other studies indicate that heart attacks increase in frequency after the switch, which may be related to a lack of sleep.
The impact of sleep deprivation tends to manifest itself differently in children, who instead of being sleepy may become hyperactive and inattentive in the days following the switch. This can impact their ability to function in school and can lead to disruptions in their relationships with friends and family.
So what can you do to help minimize the impact DST for yourself and your family? Some experts recommend taking a nap on the day before the switch, but the nap must be brief and take place well before bedtime in order to avoid disrupting the night’s sleep. If possible, you can try to get some extra sleep for a few days leading up to and after the switch to assist with the adjustment, particularly if you are a good sleeper. Another idea is to gradually shift your sleep schedule by going to sleep and waking 15-20 minutes earlier each night for 3-4 nights preceding the changeover, which can help your body adjust to the time change. Treatments often used to prevent jet lag may also be beneficial, such as exposure to bright light upon waking or a short course of melatonin pills. Talk with your doctor to find out if such treatments might be appropriate for you.
Other suggestions for easing the transition to DST include:
The adjustment can also be made more easily if you regularly practice good sleep hygiene. More information about this will come in about this in tomorrow’s blog. Also, firefighters would like to remind you that the switch to and from DST is a great time to check the batteries in the smoke and carbon monoxide detectors in your home.
For more information about good sleep habits, read the Healia Health Guide to Excessive Sleepiness. If you have a question about methods for easing the transition to DST, Ask the Experts at Healia Health Communities.
Related blog post: One-third of Americans Losing Sleep over Financial Concerns
Photo: Randy Son of Robert, Flickr, Creative Commons.
A new study reveals that a higher intake of calcium may reduce the overall risk of cancer for women and also reduce the risk of colorectal cancer and other digestive cancers for both men and women. The study appears in the February 23 edition of Archives of Internal Medicine.
Researchers from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) analyzed data from nearly 500,000 people who participated in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study that began in 1995. Participants between the ages of 50 and 71 filled out a questionnaire reporting how often and in what quantities they consumed dairy products and a wide variety of other foods, and whether they took supplements. Their records were then linked with state cancer registries to identify new cases of cancer.
After an average of seven years of follow up, nearly 50,000 cases of cancer had occurred. Calcium intake was associated with a decrease in the overall risk for all cancers in women and the more calcium women got, the more the risk decreased. Beyond 1,300 milligrams of calcium per day, no further reduction occurred.
While men did not display the same overall reduction in cancer risk, calcium intake was associated with reduced risk of cancers of the digestive system for both men and women. The top 20 percent of men who consumed the most calcium through food and supplements (about 1,530 milligrams per day on average) had a 16 percent lower risk of digestive cancers than the bottom 20 percent who consumed the least calcium (526 milligrams per day).
For women, those in the top 20 percent of calcium consumption (1,881 milligrams per day) had a 23 percent lower risk of these cancers than those in the bottom 20 percent (494 milligrams per day). This risk reduction was particularly pronounced for colorectal cancer. The study found no relationship between calcium and prostate cancer, breast cancer or other cancers.
The researchers believe that calcium may help prevent digestive system cancers by reducing abnormal growth in cells in the gastrointestinal tract or by reducing damage to the mucous membrane in the large intestine.
Calcium has long been known to be associated with bone health and calcium intake is critical in preventing osteoporosis. However, previous research into the role of calcium in cancer prevention has produced mixed results. The present study is one of the largest ever undertaken, but it relied on interviews instead of blood tests and can therefore only estimate the amount of calcium each participant had consumed.
Does this mean you should run out and buy calcium supplements? Perhaps, but the researchers found that the benefits of calcium were mostly associated with calcium-rich foods rather than supplements, although calcium from supplements alone was still effective in reducing colon cancer risk in men. Foods with lots of calcium include dairy products such as milk and yogurt and leafy green vegetables. The recommended daily calcium intake for older people is 1,200 milligrams, while for younger adults it is 1,000mg. Adolescents should get 1,300 milligrams per day of calcium.
For more information about nutrition or dietary supplements, join the Healia Health Community for Diet and Nutrition or the Healia Health Community for Dietary Supplements. Find out more about colorectal cacner at the Healia Health Community for Colorectal Cancer.
Photo (adapted): erix!, Flickr, Creative Commons
The second annual Caffeinated Cities Survey was released earlier this year, which assessed local levels of caffeine consumption. The survey was conducted via telephone by Prince Market Research for HealthSaver and involved over 2,000 consumers in 20 major metropolitan areas in the U.S. It was designed to gather information about the amount and type of caffeine consumed in cities across the country to help understand the people’s attitudes about this most widely-used stimulant.
Evidence continues to accumulate that the most commonly consumed form of caffeine, coffee, has several health benefits for people who do not have heart problems or high blood pressure, including lowering the risk of diabetes, heart disease, Parkinson’s disease, and colon cancer. It is likely that some of these benefits may be attributed to moderate caffeine consumption. However, coffee is not the only way to consume caffeine. The study also looked at other favorite ways that Americans obtain caffeine including caffeinated energy drinks, teas (green, black, and iced), colas, chocolate, and caffeine pills.
The top 5 cities in the U.S. for caffeine consumption are:
Have a question about the health benefits or risks of caffeine-containing products? Ask the Experts at Healia Health Communities.
Related blog posts: Coffee Drinking Reduces Risk of Mouth and Throat Cancers by Half
Johns Hopkins Researchers Issue Warning about High Caffeine Levels in Energy Drinks
Source: HealthSaver Caffeinated Cities Survey, 01/09. http://www.affiniongroupmedia.com/themes/site_themes/affinionassets/releases/health_saver/08caffeine/media/National_RLS.pdf
Photo: mararie, Flickr, Creative Commons
More than 50 new Healia Health Information Guides have just been launched. The Health Guides are original, consumer-friendly health information guides that provide trusted information about common health topics. Each Health Guide, written by a medical writer and reviewed by a physician, provides essential information about symptoms, causes, diagnosis, treatment, and risk factors and prevention.
Available Health Information Guides include the following topics:
This Sunday, with millions of people attending Super Bowl viewing parties in homes, bars, and restaurants across the country, safety and health should be a primary concern. With so many people heading out to parties, the roads can be a hazardous place to be both before and after the big game. The living room can also be hazardous for kids and pets when it is full of raucous partygoers. Also, Super Bowl gatherings often provide the opportunity to eat and drink too much. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has come up with a list of 5 tips to help ensure your Super Bowl Sunday is a safe and healthy one.
Enjoy the game!
Have questions about party safety or other health issues? Ask the Experts at Healia Health Communities.
Source: CDC Office of Women's Health, modified January, 2009. http://www.cdc.gov/men/superbowl/index.htm
Photo: Alissa Gail Oakley, Flickr, Creative Commons
About | Privacy Policy | Business Solutions | Advertise | Contact | Add Healia to your site
©2009. Healia / Meredith Corporation
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. All content on this Web site, including medical opinion and any other health-related information, is for informational purposes only and should not be used for a specific diagnosis or individual treatment plan for any situation. Use of this site and the information contained herein does not create a doctor-patient relationship. Always seek the direct advice of your doctor in connection with any questions or issues you may have regarding your own health or the health of others.