Regular exercise is a critical part of staying healthy. People who are active live longer and feel better. Regular exercise can help one maintain a healthy weight, delay or prevent diabetes, some cancers, and heart problems. Most adults need at least 30 minutes of moderate physical activity at least five days per week.
More
women than men experience an increase in this type of fat, especially in the
time following menopause. It is often responsible for the change in a woman’s
body to an apple shape. In men, it may manifest itself as a “beer belly.”
Sometimes
referred to as abdominal obesity, this fat is more dangerous than the subcutaneous
fat that lies just under the skin. Fat cells produce hormones, including ones
that can cause insulin resistance and type-2 diabetes. Visceral fat is also
thought to increase the risk of heart disease, metabolic problems, and high blood pressure. It has also been linked to breast cancer.
It
is quite possible for a person with a healthy weight and relatively trim
waistline to have significant amounts of visceral fat. It can be hard to see
because of where it lies; in some cases it can only be detected with an MRI.
According
to the Mayo Clinic, lack of exercise and low metabolism isn’t necessarily the
culprit. The problem, they say, may be genetics. If your family has a history
of gaining weight around the middle, it may be a challenge for you, too. In
women, hormonal changes during menopause also may cause a change in how fat is
broken down and stored.
Rather
than calculating your BMI, Mayo Clinic suggests simply measuring your
waistline. A waist measurement of 35 inches or more, the clinic says, indicates
an unhealthy concentration of abdominal fat.
One
of the best things you can do for your body is exercise regularly, and,
luckily, visceral fat responds well to working out. Daily moderate exercise
along with strength training may be your best bet to battling the bulge.
People who
work out in the morning reap a ton of benefits. Many report better moods, more
energy throughout the day and greater alertness. Thy also appear to have
better, longer workouts.
A study
from the U.K. found that morning exercisers work out harder. Translation? They
burn more calories, which means they’re more likely to lose more weight.
Another
study in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition found that exercisers who ate
breakfast were more satisfied by this meal. Some reported lower appetite
throughout the day. Researchers asked 58 obese men and women to expend 500
calories daily and eat a regular breakfast of toast, tea and cereal to shed
pounds.
“The effect of exercise on appetite regulation involves at
least two processes,” authors write, “an increase in the overall drive to eat,
and a concomitant increase in the satiating efficiency of a fixed meal.”
Authors say it is the strength of this effect that determines weight loss.
All 58 participants reported being hungrier after exercise,
but those who lost less weight reported feeling less satisfied by other meals. Although they were satisfied by
breakfast, they actually remained hungrier throughout the day. Their
counterparts had less of an appetite.
“These
data confirm that exercise has the capacity to alter the sensitivity of the
appetite regulatory system via the compensatory response to consumed foods or
preloads,” authors explain.
Despite the differences, all participants lost some weight.
Researchers attribute differences in the amount of weight lost may be due to
the lack of regulation for other meals. In any case, eating a regular breakfast
appears to increase morning meal satisfaction.
“The exercise regimen apparently raised the sensitivity of
the physiologic signaling system,” authors write, “which allowed the same
amount of food to realize a greater suppression of hunger.”
More than 2,500 adults from Adelaide, Australia, participated in a study correlating leisure-time computer use with body weight. Participants filled out a questionnaire, reporting web usage (excluding work-time computer use) and other low-energy leisure activities.
Participants were divided into sub-groups based on how much
time they spent on the Internet—no use, low use (less than 3 hours per week),
or high use (greater than 3 hours per week).
“Adults with high leisure-time Internet and computer use were more likely to be overweight or obese even if they were highly active in their leisure time, as compared to participants who did not use the Internet or computer,” study authors write.
The average time spent on the Internet was 125.3 minutes per week. Participants with high use were 1.46 times more likely to be overweight and 2.52 times as likely to be obese. They were also 2.5 times more likely to do other low-energy activities, such as watching television, for five or more hours per day.
“These findings suggest that, apart from nutritional and physical activity interventions, it may also be necessary to decrease time spent in sedentary behaviors, such as leisure-time Internet and computer use, in order to reduce the prevalence of overweight and obesity,” the authors write.
Although the results of the study are suggestive, study authors explain that there were limitations that may have affected the outcomes.
“The strong associations of leisure-time Internet and computer use with overweight and obesity may in part be explained by the association of leisure-time Internet and computer use with other leisure-time sedentary behaviors."
Further investigation on leisure-time computer use will provide more information on the effects of internet usage on health and weight.
Sixteen volunteers, ages 20
to 24, took a fitness test to determine a baseline rating of perceived exertion
(RPE). Participants were
instructed on proper usage of the game and played various Wii games while
researchers monitored oxygen intake, heart rate and RPE.
The study, led by John
Porcari, Ph. D., and Alexa Carroll, M.S., focused on six different
activities—Free Run, Island Run, Free and Advanced Steps, Super Hula Hoop, and
Rhythm Boxing.
Volunteers participated in
each of the six activities randomly for 6 minutes. The Free and Island Run
exercises required more energy, but neither used enough to meet the American
College of Sports Medicine’s standard to affect cardio endurance. The other activities fell below these
health guidelines as well.
All of the activities did,
however, burn calories. In 30 minutes, each activity burned the following
number of calories:
- Free Step, 99 calories
- Advanced Step, 108 calories
- Super Hula Hoop, 111 calories
- Boxing, 114 calories
- Free Run, 165 calories
- Island Run, 165 calories
Although these exertion
levels are significantly lower than doing similar exercise without the game,
Wii Fit still used twice the calories of other video games. This is enough
exertion to be considered a very mild workout.
“I guess anything is better than
nothing,” Porcari says, “ but we were a little bit underwhelmed by the
intensity of some of the exercises.”
An earlier study showed that
certain Wii Sports activities burned more calories.
“You’re better off doing Wii
Sports than Wii Fit,” Porcari explains. “In Wii Sports there’s more jumping
around, and you’re not constrained by having to stand on the balance pad. I
think there’s much more freedom of movement and you get a better workout.”
Thirty minutes each of Wii
Sports activities burned the following number of calories:
- Wii Baseball, 84 calories
- Wii Golf, 93 calories
- Bowling, 117 calories
- Tennis, 159 calories
- Boxing, 306 calories
These findings could cut pounds for gamers in the long run, Carroll says, but it’s best not to rely on Wii alone. “Since using the Wii Fit alone may not produce results that meet recommended physical activity guidelines it is important that individuals participate in additional exercises to effectively reach these guidelines,” she says.
Read more about the Wii Fit and Wii Sports studies.
Researchers from the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki and the Department of Anesthesiology at the "G.Papanikolaou" Regional Hospital in Thessaloniki, Greece, sought to explore the effects of exercise on medicated patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG).
Glaucoma is a disease that causes damage to the optic nerve, often resulting in severe vision loss or blindness. It is an irreversible condition that affects roughly 4 million people in the United States, about half of whom are unaware that they have it. Women, persons with diabetes or stroke, and African American men over 40 are at a greater risk.
Although glaucoma is typically seen in the elderly (persons over 60), everyone is at risk. Glaucoma may develop with or without symptoms, and as many as 10 percent of people receiving proper treatment will still experience vision loss. High intraocular pressure (IOP) is one of its many risk factors.
“Since exercise increases systemic fibrinolytic activity (such as dissolving blood clots), one can speculate that exercise decreases intraocular pressure by facilitating (uveoscleral) outflow,” authors of the study wrote.”
Based on this information, researchers gathered data from 145 individuals—100 healthy and 45 with POAG. Prior to testing researchers checked IMP levels using Goldmann’s applanation tonometry, a method of measuring the amount of pressure needed to flatten the cornea.
IMP was measured again hours after receiving medicated eye drops. Participants were then asked to engage in “moderate to sub-maximal” aerobic exercise (on a bicycle) for 10 minutes, after which IOP data was again measured.
“Regardless of the antiglaucoma medication instilled, they still benefited from the aerobic exercise since they all had a post-exercise reduction of IOP,” the authors wrote in the study. “It is obvious that these patients should be encouraged to perform aerobic exercise.”
Have more questions? Visit Healia's Glaucoma Community.
Bill Rodgers, the former top-ranked marathon runner in the world, is running next Monday’s 113th Boston Marathon to promote prostate cancer awareness at the age of 61. A four-time winner of the Boston Marathon, Rodgers will be helping Athletes for a Cure, a program of the Prostate Cancer Foundation, to raise funds for and build awareness of prostate cancer.
Swiss researchers reported Monday that any of several types of exercise can benefit people who have recently survived a heart attack. They also found that those benefits disappear when exercise is discontinued.
The researchers assigned more than 200 people who had previously suffered a heart attack to one of four exercise groups: aerobic training, resistance workouts, a combination of the two, or no exercise at all. They found that after four weeks, all three groups who were assigned to some type of exercise showed similar levels of improvement in blood vessel function, while those who did not participate in regular exercise showed no such improvement.
Some of the participants were then asked to stop their exercise regimens. One month later, all the improvements related to exercise were gone: the blood vessels of those who stopped working out had returned to their pre-exercise state.
It is unknown if the improvements in blood vessel function associated with exercise actually translate to better health and longer lives, but the researchers think it is likely. Heart disease is the world’s leading cause of death, while poor blood vessel health is the major cause of heart disease. Any improvement in vessel health is likely to reduce the risk of future heart problems.
To find out more about heart diseases, read the Healia Health Guide to Heart Disease.
Photo: Mr. T. in DC, Flickr, Creative Commons
Walk Score ranks the 40 largest cities in America and the neighborhoods within those cities based on their "walkability." The purpose is to help people find walkable places where it is easy to live a car-free (or car-lite) lifestyle. However, the cities near the bottom of the list are considered not walking-friendly or "car-dependent" meaning there are few destinations that are within walking distance so most trips will require a car or public transportation.
Walk Score calculates the walkability of an address by locating nearby stores, restaurants, schools, parks, etc. and awarding points based on the distance to the closest amenity in each category. It’s not a perfect rating scale, as it does not include weather, public transit, pedestrian-friendly design, topography, beauty of the surroundings, or man-made and natural impediments to walking; it is purely based on the proximity of amenities. Cities are defined as in the 2000 U.S. Census and neighborhood boundaries come from Zillow.com.
The list below includes the cities with the lowest overall walkability scores out of the 40 largest cities in the nation. The walkability score appears in parentheses after each city.
The top 10 least walking-friendly cities in America are:
For more information on how regular walking can improve your health, join the Healia Health Community for Exercise and Fitness.
Related blog post: The Top 10 Most Walking-Friendly Cities in America
Source: Walk Score. http://www.walkscore.com/rankings/
Photo: jmd41280, Flickr, Creative Commons
Walking is an enjoyable, cost saving, and environmentally friendly activity that almost anyone can participate in. Walk Score ranks the 40 largest cities in America and the neighborhoods within those cities based on their "walkability." The purpose is to help people find walkable places where it is easy to live a car-free (or car-lite) lifestyle.
Walk Score calculates the walkability of an address by locating nearby stores, restaurants, schools, parks, etc. and awarding points based on the distance to the closest amenity in each category. According to studies, the number of nearby amenities is the leading predictor of whether people walk. If the closest amenity in a given category is within ¼ mile, it gets the maximum points. The number of points awarded declines as the distance to the nearest amenity grows and if it is beyond 1 mile, no points are awarded. Each category is weighted equally and the points are summed and normalized to yield a score from 0–100. Scores above 90 are considered "Walker’s Paradise" meaning you can likely get by without needing to own a car. It’s not a perfect rating scale, as it does not include public transit, pedestrian-friendly design, topography, beauty of the surroundings, or man-made and natural impediments to walking; it is purely based on the proximity of amenities. Cities are defined as in the 2000 U.S. Census and neighborhood boundaries come from Zillow.com.
The list below includes the cities with the highest overall walkability scores followed by the three most walking friendly neighborhoods within each city. The walkalitily score appears in parentheses after each city and each individual neighborhood.
The top 10 most walking-friendly cities in America are:
For more information on how regular walking can improve your health, join the Healia Health Community for Exercise and Fitness.
Source: Walk Score. http://www.walkscore.com/rankings/
Photo: Benjamin Rossen, Flickr, Creative Commons
Many common winter holiday activities can help you burn off
the extra calories you consume by eating big meals and holiday treats. Below is
a list of winter holiday activities and the number of calories you will burn if
you engage in them for one hour. The number of calories burned is based on a
person weighing 150 lbs. If you weigh more, you will burn more calories, and if
you weigh less you will burn fewer calories.
|
Cross-country
skiing |
612
calories |
|
Snowshoeing |
544
calories |
|
Ice
skating |
476
calories |
|
Sledding |
476 calories |
|
Shoveling
snow |
408
calories |
|
Splitting
firewood |
408
calories |
|
Dancing |
306
calories |
|
Decking
the halls and tree |
247
calories |
|
Building
a snowman |
238 calories |
|
Baking
cookies |
170
calories |
|
|
157 calories |
|
Caroling |
129
calories |
|
Writing
holiday cards |
123 calories |
For more information about physical activity, join the
Healia Health Community on Exercise and Fitness.
Source: Indiana State Department of Health www.in.gov/isdh/
Photo: Derek Faulkner, Flickr, Creative Commons
About | Privacy Policy | Business Solutions | Advertise | Contact | Add Healia to your site
©2010. Healia / Meredith Corporation
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. All content on this Web site, including medical opinion and any other health-related information, is for informational purposes only and should not be used for a specific diagnosis or individual treatment plan for any situation. Use of this site and the information contained herein does not create a doctor-patient relationship. Always seek the direct advice of your doctor in connection with any questions or issues you may have regarding your own health or the health of others.